Touching Death In The Crotch

About two weeks ago I took ill, and fairly badly. I was experiencing the worst stomach pains I had ever felt, and I chocked it up to one of a handful of traditional explanations: alcohol poisoning (even though I had not consumed that much), the flu, male pregnancy etc.
The only relief I had from the pressure and pain, albeit temporary, was to force myself to vomit, as for some reason, my body did not want to do it naturally, which I did find quite strange.

The biggest sign that something was really wrong, was the fact that part of my upper abdomen was bloated and distended to about the size of an egg, even to the point that the skin around it was becoming discolored. Not a good sign. I just figured I had some sort of blockage in my intestine and some stimulant tea would cure what ails me.

Well, after almost five days of this, with virtually no improvements, I was finally encouraged by my dad to actually go to a real doctor to at least know what I was dealing with. So, with help, I was taken to the emergency room at a local hospital, run through cat scans and such and given a sexy gown to wear.

The news was great. Apparently I was suffering from what is known as an Incarcerated Abdominal Hernia. This is actually a bad thing. Imagine if you will (and you have no choice) the intestine and bowel getting kinked like a hose so nothing can pass through. Already pretty crappy. . .(pun). Then on top of that, imagine that this kink gets stuck in a tear in the abdominal muscles and is virtually caught right under the skin, which is not where it should be. Good times. Obviously no amount of juices, tea, and rest could have cured this.

The scary thing for me, was that the doctor then told me that if I had waited only a few more days, my bowel and/or intestine could have ruptured and most likely, I would have died. Yes died. In just a few more days. Now I'm not sure if that was accurate, but I'm not waiting around a few days to see if he was right. Just to hammer the death thing home, my electrolyte and potassium levels were so low due to all the vomiting, that I could have died from just that as well.

So I was put under and operated on that very night. I heard later, that kinked part of my bowel was literally dead, and part of it had to be removed, as well as portions of my intestine, though not much. Since everything was blocked up, the surgeon said that the upper intestine as swelled to almost ten times its normal size, and I didn't even get an award!

All in all, the surgery went well, and I began the extremely joyous recovery in the hospital. I had a tube shoved down my nose and IV's coming out of every vein. In other words, I've never looked better. My hospital stay lasted almost a week, and I can tell you that I've never felt more pathetic, feeble, and worthless. Even though my physical self was slowly healing, mentally and emotionally, the experience was quite devastating, which I never expected.

But that is behind me now. My dad broke me out of "prison" earlier this week and I've been fortunate enough to have a place to recover and heal, as I'm still not very mobile or self sufficient yet.

I'm improving day by day, but as usual, it's never fast enough. I have vocal takes to continue with, but I doubt I'll be in any good shape for pushing lots of sound through my diaphragm for a while still.

I'll get back to work as soon as I can, it's just an unfortunate set back. But hey, at least I'm not dead. . . . yet.

Self-Perception: What A Beautiful Thing!

The easy definition of self-perception would be "how we see ourselves". Though I agree with that basic notion, I have expanded the meaning with a newer observation. Self-perception goes deeper then simply how we see ourselves, it is how we would LIKE to see ourselves.

I recently went through a really rough half-a-year that forced me to do some really heavy self-examination, and let me tell you, what I found was not always what I wanted to know, hear about, or see in myself. I had seen myself as a person who does certain things, behaves in a certain way, and comes off a certain way. It's a terrible feeling to see many things within yourself that you do not like about others, and that is exactly what I discovered.

Being that we are self-biased to begin with, it is not always easy to be objective about who you really are. Sure, we all think that we know who we are, as I'm sure you think you know who you are (at least to a point). Sometimes we behave or speak in ways that are unbeknownst to us, and are quite obvious to those around us. Often these subconscious traits are interpreted to mean something unintended by the person perpetrating the actions. One way to see this would be that if someone interprets something about what you did/said then they are wrong about who you are, since they merely took what you did in whatever way they took it, right? Because you are not aware of something about yourself, and because other people interpret something out of what you did/said, does that mean it is not part of who you are?

The answer, of course, is that it is all you. In fact you can only know yourself from your own, internal perspective. And while this is a very deep perspective, filled with insights and understanding that no other human being will ever be privy to, or comprehend, it is not the only facet of what makes up your being.

Therefore, I will say that most people (myself included) tend to view themselves with incomplete evidence, thereby giving only a partial picture of who we are. In that way, it would be almost impossible to know yourself fully. Adding to this, is the idea that we are more interested in seeing ourselves in an ideal sort of way, as opposed to a realistic way. We view ourselves in the future sense, the person who has arrived not the person who is getting there. Why? That is how we would like to see ourselves: as the most accomplished, successful, interesting, intelligent, talented, attractive, important, influential, cool, and all around good person we could (and maybe should) be.

More often then not, these thoughts and views of ourselves are not conscious. They are like our dreams intruding on out self image. And most of the time I would guess we are completely unaware that we have a jaded view, and largely, an inaccurate grasp upon who we really are as people.

One of the upsides to a fantasy-like perception of one's self, is that it can actually be a catalyst to get us to become that person we want to be, or accomplish the thing we want to accomplish. And other times, it can do the very opposite and keep us from doing anything as, in a way, we are already there.

Sometimes self-perception can be intentional. It can be used as an avoidance of certain aspects of who we are that we refuse to accept or are afraid of. As is well known, fear is one of the biggest, if not THE biggest negative motivators in our lives.

As a semi personal example, I had a friend who fit some of these ideas. For this blog I'll change the name and call him Zeus (why? It's a cool name, and I feel that more people should be named after greek gods).

Zeus had surrounded himself with many superficial friends, would attend a lot of parties and such, and by all accounts was a quite liked, respected and popular guy. Zeus was under the impression that he was a fairly self sufficient person, yet my observations of his true nature were quite different. I had told him, on one occasion, that I thought that he was a person who craved attention, needed to be adored by other people, and was quite co-dependant. Now, these don't have to be fully bad traits, but if someone sees them as such, as I sort of did, they can be.

Zeus, naturally, denied my claims outright. The last thing he would want to think about himself is that he is, in some ways, desperate for attention, and needs to be fawned over by silly young girls (not that that is torture by any means). But the thing is he never saw himself as a superficial person in that regard, and had thought he was someone who was quite independent and did not need the lavish praise of others to make himself feel good. Obviously, we all need some form of outside validation once in a while, so there is no blame being passed there. But when he is going out of his way to wear the latest, most fashionable clothes and to attend all of the hippest social gatherings as much as possible, one starts to wonder what the motivation is. The idea of him embodying all of these traits was absolutely awful to him, and therefore he was more content to see himself as the person he wanted to be, without actually being that person.

One of my personal favorite examples of Self-Perception is the show American Idol. Though I am generally not a big watcher of the show, and could never tell you, let alone recognize the new winners each year, what I do love about the show is the first few episodes where I get to watch all of the awful singers make fools of themselves on national television. I'm sure some of you can relate.

What makes this such a great example of our topic, is the strangely high number of contestants that, by all accounts, are genuinely terrible at singing, and yet seem to be convinced that they are amazing, let alone good.

I can recall several specific instances whereby a hopeful young person gives their audition, in what can be observed by musicians and non-musicians alike, as god awful. Blatantly tone-deaf, and just all around embarrassing. Once the performer is finished (or cut off usually), the judges tend to tell the person, in so many words, that they are not a good singer, and rightfully so. Now comes the interesting part. The performer in question has, many a time, responded in general idea of, "You [judges] are the ones who do not know anything. I actually am a great singer. All of my friends and family think so too!"

What is startling is that all of America (and other countries that watch the show) know that this person had just performed terribly, it's almost fact. Granted art can, and is, interpreted in different ways, and one man's trash is another man's treasure. All fine and good. But I would assume that most people would consider this singer's voice garbage.

What is the biggest support this singer has to validate his/her self beyond their personal opinion? Outside sources. In this example the person cited friends and family who reassured or even encouraged them. Outside validation is a potent thing, I know this well. It can inspire us to try even harder, or to give up completely.

So let's look at the contestant's assertions.

He/she is a good singer because other people told him/her so. Why would people intentionally tell such a terrible "talent" such utter rubbish? Here are a few scenarios I can think of:

A) The friends/family are fully conscious of the aspiring singer's abilities, and are telling them positive things as to not hurt the person's feelings.

This is yet another great observation about human behavior that you'll see quite often. We tend to avoid telling the truth when such a view-point will hurt the feelings of the person in question. So encouragement of that person's self-delusion of the trait, idea or situation is furthered, sparing the person temporary hurt for long-term ignorance. Is this really the best solution here? Would not the long term growth and understanding outweigh the momentary emotion of being told a truth that contradicts what a person would WANT to hear?

B) The friends/family are fully conscious of the aspiring singer's abilities, and are telling them positive things to have that person go out and fail miserably.

It happens. In this case I would assume that the person, or rather the victim, is probably not on the best terms with the friends/family, and they are trying to teach this person a lesson. Sounds a bit vindictive, and spiteful too, but hey, that's human.

C) The friends/family are delusional just like the singer and really don't know what good vocalists sound like. Hence them praising and encouraging awfulness.

I suppose a fourth scenario is that this person is truly a vocal virtuoso, and all of the rest of the world is wrong. Not bloody likely.

The singer's self-perection of him/her self is that they indeed can sing wonderfully. Look how far from reality self-perception can take us. Look how distorted this person's view of themselves is. The result of this is that after watching something like this, I tend to throw that same critical perspective back on myself. The comparison goes like this:

That person sings - I sing.

That person thinks they are at least a decent singer - I think I am at least a decent singer.

That singer was actually terrible and could not objectively hear themselves - Maybe I am a terrible singer who cannot objectively hear myself.

What is the difference between me and this person?

Well, as I see it, potentially nothing. What would be my argument in this? Probably something like, "Well the difference is I actually am a decent singer." Que? I just used the same logic this American Idol contestant used. That is no way to prove anything. Alright then, my next argument would be outside validation: "I have other people telling me I have a fairly ok voice, therefore I do." Well, again you see where this is going. Same as the god damn same. Again what is the difference between me and this person? This line of questioning has frightened me on numerous occasions in the past.

Another example involves a local band which I had the distinct "pleasure" to see and hear live. Band bios and band members are a great and fiber-rich source of self-perception. Being a musician and having a band over time I am no stranger to this. Musicians always think they are the best players, performers, writers, etc. Why? Because they want to be, thats why.

During my time working in clubs, I met my fair share of musicians in bands. I also met my fair share of musicians in bands who will use every opportunity to tell you that they are in a band, when and where they are playing/have played, and why they are so amazing/popular/important. Usually I just smile and nod, never mentioning that I too have a musical project and blah blah blah.

I will refrain from mentioning the names of the people, or the band name for politeness reasons, as these people have only ever been very nice to me, and this is not meant to be a full out attack, just an observation.

One light acquaintance in the scene was a nice guy who was working on his band's debut EP, which to my knowledge was an industrial/EBM sort of deal. He would tell me every time about the progress on the album and about the style of music and such. Basically it was quite hyped to me, and I was expecting a lot from him.

So what about self-perception?

Good point. The topic of this blog, yes. Well, I was given a copy of their EP (since we discussed mixing and mastering on many occasions) and was given their myspace address and website.

Upon reading their little band biography, the term "self-perception" flashed in my head like an "applause" sign. Here in the bio I read such phrases as (and I'm paraphrasing) ". . . and blends these styles into a powerful new sound. . ." in addition to listing a bunch of genres that they say they sound like or mix together.

This type of speak is rampant in the music world, and a big reason for me understanding this was I too had done this in my earlier years. Yes, guilty as charged.

Every band wants to tell you about how they are completely unique, original, new, different etc. Just because they want to be something, or want to have others think that they are something, does not mean that they are. And in this case, it is particularly true. So back to the example.

". . . and blends these styles into a powerful new sound. . .". Just as I said, they want very much to be these things, which is why they say them. Are they really unique and new? Well, the reality is they are not. Their sound was complete derivative of the industrial/EBM style, with virtually nothing fresh or "avant-garde" as they also said, to fly under the banner of " a powerful new sound". The music was by the book, generic music that sounded almost identical to their influences. Now let me say that they did what they did just fine. Not great mind you, but it was still passable by grading standards. I'm objecting to their idea of what they say they are, not what they actually are.

I mentioned that they saw themselves as a mix of genres. I believe the ones listed were: gothic, rock, electro and classical. Right off the bat, having heard their songs (yes more then one), I will concede and give them goth and electro, as the music was mostly synth based and was in a gothic style. But rock and classical? Rock is generally live drums, guitar, bass. Now they had a guitar player on stage, but his part was so minimal to their sound that they turned him down to barely audible live, and did the same on the CD. Also there is no drummer live, as everything is run off of backing tracks with programmed drums. This does not bother me at all, until you call it rock, which it is not. Finally the big one: classical? Classical. Are you serious man? Have you heard classical progressions and instrumentation before? I'm sorry but some barely-moving synth string parts does not mean the music is classically influenced. You yourself could listen to classical music, but it does not mean your music bares resemblance to it.

That last one is kind of personal as I used the same genre in describing my first album "Sweet Painful Reality" back in 2002. That album was by no means classical, yet it used some string sounding parts, and guess what? I wanted it to be perceived that way! Yes I even said there were Jazz influences, when there were none (at least on that album). Self-perception my friends. I said it was something because I wanted to be those things, not because it actually was.

So next time you watch an interview with a movie star, musician, politician or other such person, pay careful mind to what that person is saying and how they are saying it. Soon it becomes startling how much of what a person says about themselves is not actually who they are, but who they want to be. Not what they have actually done, but what they would like to do. And we are all guilty of this.

In conclusion, self-perception can be a great thing once you become aware of it. Self-perception is an ongoing process, as are most journeys of self discovery. But when you begin to be a bit more critical with yourself, and see yourself for the flaws, and flat-sides you have, only then can you really see the truth in who you are, and then begin to work on yourself, becoming the person that you always wanted to be. Except this time it's not delusional.

Death Of The Album, and The Death Of Music

Does anyone else feel fed up and bored with music these days? Does anyone else feel less excited upon hearing new music? And do you remember the last time you actually went out to buy an album, and not only that, but then were really blown away by it? And I mean the whole, entire album. I have been feeling this way for quite some time now.

Let me first say that the most important thing to me is composing new music. Depending on my mood and the piece I'm working on, it can still be one of the most thrilling and spiritual experiences I can obtain. My personal passion for writing music is as strong as it ever was.

That being said, let me bring us back to the current state of music.

More and more people are downloading their music instead of buying physical albums now. This story is by far nothing new and has been covered to death over the course of the last several years.

Why does this matter?

Well, in someways it matters not. People want music, which is good, and people get music, which is also good.

One of the biggest arguments against this is artist compensation, as a lot of people will download the songs they want for free through file sharing programs instead of buying the album. Should the artist be able to make money selling his or her art? Absolutely. Should a huge record company take the majority of the profits and leave the artist in debt to them? Not so much.

So how is downloading for free any different then making a copy of a friends cassette tape only a few decades ago, or burning a CD from someone, as some of us still do? Well, in my mind nothing. I've done both of these many times as I grew up. Many times, if I had burned off a CD, or made a good ol' tape of an album my friend had, if I really liked it, I would eventually go out and buy my own copy. Not always, mind you, but sometimes I would.

Now the point of this is not to address piracy or anti piracy, but to pull up a little dirt behind a few reasons, psychologically, we (see: some of us) download over buying the album.

For the sake of answering them later, let me ask a few questions out loud:

Do people want to buy albums?

Regardless of buying, do people even want a whole album anymore?

Do people just want the hit single(s)?

And if so, why?

Everyone loves to point blame at the fans and consumers. It's easy. THEY are the ones downloading right? THEY are the ones not going to record stores and buying the new hot album the radio tells them to buy. That means that the fault is all theirs! People just don't like albums anymore. That was easy. Case closed.

This a good theory to avoid the fact that soilent green is people. The machine is recycling it's own waste and giving it back to you. Let me illuminate.

Well, I for one, do not put the blame entirely in the consumer's hands. Sure, everyone should always take responsibility for their share of involvement, but also recognize when there are other factors leading to their decisions. The underlying subconscious motivations that have been building up for some time.

Let me pontificate on why many of us have become so used to, and in fact prefer to download a few songs here and there versus buying a whole album.

Ready for this? I blame the music itself. Yes, the music. And who is responsible for that music? The artists and the labels.

"So why do you blame the music?"

Follow me on this for a minute. If bands and artists no longer put out albums that are worthy of your time and money, people will eventually feel that - get this - albums are not worth their time or money. Startling!

How many times have you purchased a new album based on hearing one or two songs, say on the radio (if anyone still listens to that) or TV or something, only to be disappointed by the rest of the record? I'm going to assume a decent amount. At least where mainstream music is concerned, which is where this writing is primarily focused.

So now you have an album you just spent upwards of $18.99 list pice (remember Tower Records?), and you only like maybe two songs, or worse, just one. That renders the other 12 or so songs worthless, doesn't it? Why did you just waste your money? I bet you wish you could have just bought the song (s) that you liked. . . .

Hmmm. . . . ah HA!

One of my theories is that mainstream music has continually released mediocre and soul-less collections of "music" onto an unwitting public for so long that eventually the public responded like someone who has been burned one too many times in relationships. They move on.

So what happened? Do artists no longer care about putting out actual 'Art'? Do record labels really push their artists (or songwriters and producers in this case) to write a few "sure thing" songs that will sell and then quickly slap the rest together so they can start making money? Yes.

Lets start with easy easy one. Record labels.

Sure, they are like the faceless, evil corporations we love to hate in books and films, but are they all bad? No, of course not. But what started as engineers and producers who were not only in the actual, literal music business, and also really loved good music, turned into a giant corporate mechanism that churns out plastic discs.

Record labels will sign new bands and artists for financial reasons only. I'm sure you knew this one already. Most labels do not care how creative or talented the artist is, not to mention if they personally are moved by, or even enjoy the music that artist makes . Most often it is based on a mathematical formula involving the theory that "THIS band sounds really close to THAT band. If THAT band sold X amount of albums, we can market THIS band to those same fans, they will at least sell Y albums." Yes folks, no art. Just math. Again, nothing earth shattering here. But it is another point along the path.

Record labels do not care about art. Art means risk, and risk means it's not a sure thing.

This brings us to the second offenders, the artists themselves. If we follow the path I've mentioned so far we already have a band signed to a label not because of their creative potential, but because of quick turn around profits. So it's going to be difficult to depend on this average, to below-average talent pool to come up with a poignant piece of art. They may get lucky with those one or two songs you bought the album for, but everything else on that record is, unfortunately, filler.

What a sad term we had to coin. Album filler. Literally writing a song or songs just to take up space on a CD to pad in between the songs they actually spent a bit of time on. Is that the kind of record you want to buy? An album that even the artists themselves don't really care about enough to make it worth your while? This is the biggest thing of all for me in this chain: If a band or artist does not take the idea of music and an album of music seriously, guess what? The fans will eventually feel the same. If music is not treated as art, it won't be appreciate as art. It's hard to get excited about the food if the chef who makes it shrugs and says, "eh, it's ok". Boy, I really want to eat here again!

To add insult to injury, and then insult the injury again, there is a gross over saturation of "music" in the market place these days. There are just plain and simple, too many bands. Everyone you talk to is in a band. Everyone. And I'm sure you are familiar with the concept of percentages. With so many new bands and artists out there, that means there is a whole bunch of really great music now right? . . . . And with the current trend in music pointing towards the super simplification of music, and the glorification of people who cannot play their instruments well, it's no wonder music seems to be so dull and lifeless now.

I have always felt that, at least for me, music should be art. Music should move people, make them think and feel. Music can be impactful and life-changing. Music can help us through difficult situations and inspire us to grow and better ourselves. Music has the potential to help shape the general consciousness and literally change the world. Yes, I really do believe all of this. But most of the music right now has dropped the ball. In fact, I so strongly believe in the power of music that I think a lot of the music out right now is actually helping to regress us as a social consciousness. Yes. Move us backwards on the path to continued enlightenment and self awareness. I told you it's powerful shit.

It's as simple as this. If people are given an album worthy to purchase, they will purchase it. Do people want a really good album? Hell, I know I do, but it is getting very hard to find at the moment.

Once the industry as a whole understands that people don't really enjoy the taste of feces, and would rather have fillet mignon, maybe, just maybe they will see why they no longer have a job in the music business.

Let's bring art back to the people.

Valentines Day Musings

I was going back and forth debating whether or not to post anything in regards to Valentines Day. I know it's an easy topic to criticize, and I'm betting that there will be a significant number of blogs posted today with more or less the same sentiment, nevertheless, I have observations that I wanted to get collected as well.

Without further ado, my blog: Valentines Day Musings.

I've only had one good Valentines Day. One in. . . .well. . . .a good handful anyway. Ever since I was old enough to have the concept of love mean something to me, I began to place a small bit of importance to February 14th. I was inundated with commercials, movies, music and books that pushed idealized love, and for that matter, a particular day to show that love. At the beginning, this was all taken for granted. But as many of you find when growing up and dealing with reality, and people, you begin to lose your glossy outlook on life, and unfortunately, love.

The easiest thing to say here (and coincidentally, the most obvious) is that Valentines Day is just that. A Day. Just another day in which many companies desperately plot to sell their wares to you, and even more clever, make you feel guilty for not purchasing their wares. Similar the many other yearly staple of obligatory holidays like Christmas, father's/mother's day, birthdays, halloween, and the biggest offender of all, Canada Day!

Knowing full well that most of these holidays are now entirely driven by companies and their "must have" goods, does not change the fact that this day is built around the fallacy of idealized love. You've probably noticed, but most people's relationships are not like the movies. Many couples get together as a mistake, or as a result of too much alcohol. Most couples won't last, and the ones that do often stay together, not because of true love, or even regular love. Comfortability is a common bond. Staying together because it's easy. Or staying together out of fear of the unknown. Sometimes it's worse. Sometimes they stay together for only physical attraction when they fight, scream, hurt, abuse and cheat on one another regularly. Good times. Why don't they show that couple on commercials? That's at least real.

I can tell you personally that having the notion of idealized, perfect love has not helped me in my strange journey through life. Trust me, it's a beautiful concept and when displayed in stories, songs and film, it is everything you ever hoped for. But the side effects are that we get these ideals in our subconscious and forever distort our more healthy, grounded understanding of two people interacting, into something that can never be obtained, leaving us forever unsatisfied and unfulfilled. But wait - there's more!

The result of all this Valentines Day hulabaloo is actually often the opposite of the original intention by only causing those without a relationship to feel lonely and unworthy, just in it's inherent nature. This feeling can also make us question ourselves and put in a need for finding a significant other. What this is basically telling me in so many words is that I am no good on my own, and 'everyone else' is in a relationship and therefore so must I be. Not really the best affirmation for self-empowerment is it?

What about those of us in a relationship during the obligatory "you better do something nice for me" day? Does it really offer the great romantic potential that we see plastered all over our TV screens? I'm going to go ahead and just say 'no' here. I think that many a "V-day" has the chance to be pleasant and nice, but I'm going to wager that the truth of the matter is that it's really more stress and disappointment then anything else. How romantic can it be to receive a gift or gesture of affection when it is subliminally required? Hell, it's not even subliminal, it's direct and shoved down your throat! Back to the matter, yes, it's always nice to be thought of. But it's not quite as thoughtful when you realize that they were supposed to think of you, in a way, required to think of you. Isn't what in part makes something romantic is the fact that it is not fully expected? Getting a gift from someone on a random day to show they were just thinking of you seems to me a greater sign of that persons interest in you. That or they are cheating and feeling guilty. I'm trying to stay with the former here.

Many of these holidays have far too much expectation built around them. Once there is the requirement to do something or buy something for someone, expectations set in and forever skew your enjoyment of said gestures. Either it was not good enough, or it was the same as last year, or the same as an ex-lover who you are not on good terms with, or you just end up feeling guilty because your other made more effort then you and made you feel that your mindless contribution to the monetary obligation machine was less then.

And yet, with all of this very heady talk of analyzing this and that, and fully realizing that this day has no power or real meaning, my emotions still get the best of me and for whatever reason, make me wish I still had someone to feel obligated to buy something for.

Examination Of Why I Post Blogs

Just an observation:

Is it just me, or does it ever seem like you mostly post these silly blogs when you are not in a good place in your life? Maybe not. But it for sure seems that way to me.

I would have to say that most of the things I have posted on here (besides something promotion wise) was posted out of some sort of shitty emotion, i.e. being angry, depressed, lonely, etc.

Additionally, I know that most of the time I feel compelled to post my thoughts and feelings is when I am between relationships. Strange eh?

Is this due to the fact that being single, you are looking for attention? I guess it could explain on a subconscious level why I might post more in this state. I'm sure there are other reasons wrapped in there as well.

There are times, of course, that I may be exceptionally excited about an event or person/place/thing (remember your nouns), that I am called away to the magic (see: waste of time) of the internet to post my thoughts about whatever may be, so that 4 or 5 random people may skim through it and leave a pointless comment about it.

One thing to think about (at least for myself) is the fact that I don't really have a lot of friends. I know plenty of people, but I guess by choice and my charming elitist attitude, I keep very few people close to me. I do, however, have several levels of acquaintances ranging from those that I may say hello to, and those that are almost what I consider friends.

Why do I mention this? Well, in posting a blog about my state of mind on the public forum of the McWeb--, I am inviting anyone to read a text based reflection of myself at a given moment in time. Now most of the people on here I would consider an acquaintance, by which I mean no offense. But do I really care what people will think or say in regards to this? Not really, no.

So in summation I guess this is really just some sort of personal therapeutic vehicle for collecting and focusing my mind, rather then a plea for attention to those I rarely speak with. At least I hope so.

I guess I will be posting some more blogs for a while. 'Tis the season. Unfortunately.

Studio Upgrade Part 1: The Waiting

Greetings kiddos!

I've decided to chronicle the upgrade of Crucial Fiction Studios, which as you might have figured out, is my personal home studio.

This first blog will consist mostly of me explaining my recent frustrations and the reason for the sub-heading "the waiting...". In the next installment, I will spend the time explaining in detail the transformation from my old home studio, to my new sexy beast of a semi-real deal studio, complete with photos and a fairly comprehensive breakdown of the new equipment I will now have the pleasure of using in my musical arsenal. I know there are a few of you who are actually interested in knowing what technological toys people use, and all three of you will be in luck....but not until the next blog.

So here's my story so far:

I've had a small project studio for a little while now, which I've put to good use so far doing the preproduction for Sweet Painful Reality in 2002, and the entire production of Empyreal Progeny in 2003 and 2004. Lately I have been reaching the limitations of what my current set up can do, and therefore, with the help of some generous investments, I have been acquiring the necessary components of my much needed (and very exciting) studio upgrade.

I have been an avid ProTools user for many years now (pun intended for those that get it). So when I found an amazing deal on Digidesign's website advertising a Protools LE 7 bundle with a Control 24 and a bunch of extras for a discounted price, I jumped at the opportunity.

Oddly, Digidesign did not offer the super sweet package through their own website, but instead directed me to the nearest authorized dealer - in this case a local Guitar Center. With money in my account and a twinkle in my eye (dramatization), I skipped the light fandango into said Guitar Center and promptly asked the first competent looking sales associate in the Pro Audio section to order in the aforementioned bad ass bundle.

Well, after looking in their system for several minutes seeming confused, the associate told me he had to look on Digi's website himself to figure out what the deal was. Armed with this new online information, he searched their computers yet again to no avail. Finding no information, he decided to call Digidesign personally and ask them about this ProTools bundle. I guess they must have cleared things up, as he seemed confident that he could get it in, but they required a down payment before he could put the order through. No problem, I can do that.

The next day I waltz (thats a slow 3/4 with accents on 2 and 3) into the place ready to put down the money and get the ball rolling on my extreme joy. I have to admit I am rather naive when it comes to financial matters, and not realizing that there is a limit on debit cards (I know, it's stupid of me), tried to put this multi-thousand dollar purchase in its entirety, on the card.

Nope. WHA??!! Lets try it again.

Nope. Huh? I'm good for the money, what's the deal?

Now I get the fun of being on hold for a half hour while calling the bank to authorize a large purchase on my card, and the hold music is terrible. Finally I get a person on the line and I tell them the situation and ask them to help me make this purchase. I receive the information that I need to call to local branch instead, then she transfers me and I get to listen to the great hold music again. SWEET!!! So far, so good.

I'm an easily frustrated person, but I'm willing to endure a bit more then normal to get my god damn ProTools system.

Still holding.....

Ah! A person!

"Still there sir? Sorry. They should pick up any second now."

Neat. So i decide to hit the speaker button on the phone to entertain the Pro Audio associate with the shitty hold music.

The same lady gets on the line again, asks for my number and tells me they will call me back in a few minutes. Oh good.

Guess what? More time passes and then I finally get a call from the bank. With a long sigh, I answer the phone.

"My name is so and so (he had hippy parents) and I need to verify some recent transactions for security purposes."

Now they think I have stolen my own credit card. So now I am put into the awkward place of trying to prove that I am indeed who I say I am, and that the recent "purchases" (which didn't even go through) were made by that same person (me).

After all of this, I still can't use my card to pay for what I'm here for, but at least, thank god, I know that I am me.

So I bypass everything and just get a cashiers check. Problem solved!! It's smooth sailing from here on out!! THE ENTIRE REST OF MY LIFE WILL BE EASY PICKIN'S!! YESSSSSSSSSSS!!!! So I hand it over with relief and get assured that everything will arrive next wednesday. Sounds good.

The following days pass at an agonizingly slow pace. I spend most of my time online staring at the photos of the awesome technological heroin I would soon overdose in.

Wednesday finally rears its ugly head after so much taunting. I run into Guitar Center like Calvin checking the mailbox for his propeller beanie. I ask with doe eyes about my package...my protools package. After making a few calls to other sales associates, I get informed that it did not arrive that day, but it should be there the very next day. DAMN YOUSE!!!!

Thursday I happen to be in the neighborhood, and decide to stop in and check on my baby. Again I get shot through the heart, and they are to blame. Nope. No Protools sexiness for me. try again the next day. ARRRRRGGGGGGG!!!!

On Friday I wise up a little, and call first. If you have been reading this far, I'm sure you can guess what happens next:

BOOBS.

Good. You're still with me. Anyway, yes, they don't have it. Obviously I am very frustrated by now having gone home with blue balls several times in a row.

The next week is spent primarily waiting until Guitar Center opens, calling them to bug them about my shipment, being bitterly disappointed, then crying into a pint of Heath Bar Crunch.

Then I get a call from my friend at Guitar Center telling me that he spoke to Digidesign, and no one seemed to know what was going on with my package (feel free to giggle at the word package). Nothing had even shipped and apparently they didn't have many of the pieces necessary to complete the glory of the bundle.

What??!! If you advertised that you were selling something, wouldn't you make sure you actually had a good number of that product in your inventory to actually sell to people who have money? Sure you would, because you subscribe to obvious logic.

Okay, so they don't have all of the parts and they won't let my friend at G.C. fill in those missing pieces with products he has on hand at his store. Swell. I have an idea! How about I wait a long time!!??

It's been two weeks since then and I have been in contact periodically with my "dude" at G.C. who has usually just spoken to someone at Digi again, and gives me similar news: "they still don't have the parts, sorry. But you are their top priority now."

Awww gee. Just give me the fucking bundle!

After a few more monotonous set backs, things have finally shipped and now I am just waiting for it to come in (this time for real we think....). My new time frame is earliest tomorrow (saturday) and most likely Monday / Tuesday. I can't type the word 'sigh' enough.

Well, I wasted too much of your time with my bitching for the night. Soon I will have my vindication in hardware and software form and I will rejoice to the heavens above (or below if you are cocky. See: "Raining Unlike Water").

Next blog should be 100% bitch-free, and instead be bloated with silly photos and technical jargon!

Hip Hop Essay Part 1: The Music

Hip Hop Essay Part 1
Hip hop part 1: The Music

Welcome to my two part commentary on Hip Hop music and culture. Please understand that what follows is just one person's opinions. You are not required to agree. I would like to also acknowledge that the following dissertation applies only to mainstream hip hop music and culture (MTV, Radio, mass media), and I do understand that there are many underground artists that do not fit into the arguments and points stated below.



Once, a long long time ago, there was an era where in order to be in the music "business" (I use the word business in quotes here due to the fact that up until the 1950s the music business wasn't the billion dollar empire we know and love today), you had to be a musician. Now, call me old fashioned if you want, but I am still of this mindset. You may be asking, "What does this have to do with Hip Hop?!" Hold your horses my fine feathered friend, and do read on.

Generally, a person would spend a great deal of time practicing their instrument, and gaining experience writing songs, melodies, chord patterns and the like. This simple aspect, I feel, is missing from today's mainstream hip-hop scene.

To me, it separates the genre further out from most other forms of music, in that the namesake behind many of today's most over-saturated "artists" are not musicians at all, hence, one who creates or plays music. Instead, this portion of the song (see: any and all musical and rhythmic anything) is farmed out to the role of the Producer. The Producer's job inside the hip-hop arena, is to essentially create that "artist's" entire song from the ground up, while said namesake contributes Lyrics.

Luckily for this hip hop figurehead, his (or hers, but mostly his) producer has been nice enough to take all of the hard work out of making an album, leaving this person more time to spend yet unearned album-advance money on important things like rims and platinum-capped teeth. Can you imagine all the time this person would have wasted spending years learning an instrument, and learning to write songs even if only utilizing the most basic musical ideas? That path is for losers.

When I ask people why they enjoy hip hop, one of the first responses is usually something to the effect of: "I like music with a good beat". Lately, I have to admit, hearing this phrase makes me wince. I heard two people say this at work the other day when talking about getting new sound systems installed in their cars. "Gotta have my beats," one employee stated while bobbing his head to signify the "beats" he had to have. I think the reason this makes me upset is that when worded this way, it doesn't even sound like one is talking about music anymore, but simplistic ear-fodder for nodding.

I will concede here and admit that there are several hip hop songs with a very catchy groove pattern, coupled with memorable hooks. Usually very danceable, and I assume this is what people like about it. I too enjoy dancing, and I enjoy having good songs to dance to. But a song can still be memorable and catchy without necessarily being danceable.

One unfortunate side of this (at least for me), is the repetition of the programmed beat itself, and more often then not, the bass-line, and whatever extra layers therein. Now as we've just established, the majority of these mainstream hip hop songs are made with dance clubs as a priority, so redundancy can actually prove an asset when pounding a chorus into people's brains. I for one have never really been into grossly repetitive music, though I'm sure I still may be guilty of liking one or two along the way, which I freely admit.

On the subject of beats, I'm disappointed in the lack of creativity I hear in these over-played songs. I rarely, if ever hear a hip hop song pushing any experimental boundaries outside of the world of 4/4 time. Not that one has to have every song in 5/8 or 11/16 to be classified as "creative", far from it. I'm merely bringing up a simple observation that I just don't hear much variance across the board. An easy explanation for this could be that odd time signatures can make a song awkward to dance to...Or maybe no one cares to innovate and try new things.

Another thing I rarely hear, is a live drummer on hip hop records. If people think hip hop is really all about the beats, then why not get a live drummer on the tracks and have them play some great grooves that breathe and change during the song?

I recall seeing performances on television where big name rap stars had a full live band to back them for the one-off event. I remember thinking how much more interesting, energetic and enjoyable the artist/songs were with all of these musicians playing their instruments with him. Yet, when hearing the album version of the same song(s), I was disappointed to hear the same old drum machine beats, without the minor changes and nuances of a human player.

The next element is the actual music portion of the song, which by in large consists of a bass-line and possibly a few sound loops that repeat the same thing throughout the duration of the track. Not a lot to comment on here. This is obviously the least important part of the song, given its generally minimalistic nature and the lack of effort put into it. It's interesting to observe that in many hop hop songs, the "music" is the least important part of the music.

Lastly we have the lyrics. Yes, yes, how to begin? Let me start off by saying that I used to listen to a lot of hip-hop/R&B during the early 90s, when I was a youngin. Some of the artists people will shrug off and laugh at today, but never the less, I did listen. What I liked was the fun and positive vibe from the early days of hip hop, and yes, to tie into the paragraph above, the fact that many of the songs were great to dance to. But as soon as gangsta rap crossed into the norm, I transitioned into different styles of music.

I do understand that when gangsta rap first became popular, it did have a message and was portraying something that was real and hadn't been talked about much in music before. The lyrics spoke of injustices and hardships that most of middle-class America never paid attention to.

Jump forward in time and one gets the impression that mainstream rap has lost its message. I do believe that the basic concept of rap is rhythmic poetry set to a beat. If I am correct, let's go down the checklist.

Beat? Check.

Rhythm? Check.

Poetry? .................um....sometimes?

It is in my humble opinion, that all the 'art' from hip hop has been gradually drained away (Once again, I am talking about mainstream, pop culture hip hop, not the select underground groups which don't apply here).

Music is supposed to be art. If the art from hip hop is no longer there, can it still truly be music?

You can try to follow along with the lyrics to many 'songs' these days, only to get quickly confused as to the point the rapper is trying to make. Random words and sentences sewn together in a haphazard tapestry of nothingness. Try to make sense out of a lot of these anti-lyrical lyrics and one starts to wonder if there really is any real point at all. Maybe the author is just writing over my head. Maybe his lyrics are too ahead of his time and will not be understood for another hundred years. Or maybe this all-wise author is actually too uneducated to form a serious and cohesive statement.

"But He's rhymin' yo. Dats poetry!"

I'm sorry friends, but rhyming for the pure sake of rhyming does not poetry make. Especially rhyming the same word with itself in excess of 3 and 4 times. Some of the better poetry I've heard in my lifetime has used free-verse non-rhyming schemes, therefore giving the author the room he needs to express his thoughts without the restrain of being confined to rhyming every or every other line.

And I don't care how many times you mention your own name in a song, you're still not convincing me that art is taking place here. In fact, the more I hear the artist mentioning his own name in the song, the more it becomes a commercial, not real music.

Most of what I hear these days, and for the past several years, has been a three and a half minute long self-glorification with a desperate plea for the world to "look at me!!"

Yes guy, I see you. Apparently you have a lot of money since to appear to be driving expensive cars and throwing one hundred dollar bills around like they are covered with the ebola virus. This is something I look up to you for, thanks for calling my attention to it. You know, now that I think about it, money is everything. And thank god I have money, because it also buys happiness.

Material possessions (including women), money and "look how cool I am", have been shoved in my face for quite sometime now. I get it. You have no real message. For all the repetition of "Keepn' it Real", there is not much real about it. It is an image, a style. A chance for people to hear them and think how cool/tough/pimpn' they are. There is not much to be admired about cocky, ego-centric boasting. If someone is truly "cool", they would not be so insecure as to have to point that fact out to you several times a day.

The lack of real self expression though poetry, or at least thought-out words, is quite evident. Where are these individual's thoughts and ideas? Where are their personal perspectives on life and all things within it? Is Hip hop a form of self-expression? If so, I'm still searching for any clear and real message beyond the childishness of the ego.

Though I feel like an ass saying this (sometimes), the more I consider all of these points, the less and less I feel that hip hop can even be considered music. I would love to see some new artists come out with something fresh, musical and artistic and prove me wrong. I really would.